Preparation of a New Type of Silk Birth-canal Microecology Transporter
Abstract
To optimize the preparation parameters of the new silk birth-canal microecology transporter (BMT) for transferring the symbiotic bacteria of the birth canal efficiently. Methods Birth canal microbial samples of 30 full term pregnant women at admission were collected as the control group (NC, n=30). The experimental group included 18 pregnant women terminated by Cesarean section, who were divided into 6 sub-groups (M1-M6, n=3) to complete the transfer tests of the birth-canal microecology. The new silk BMT was processed in the sterile liquid of the different osmotic pressure with the different immersion depth, and was placed in the vagina of the pregnant women for 1 h before sealed. All extracted DNA specimens were amplified in the V3-V4 region of the 16S rDNA, and were sequenced by Illumina Hiseq2500. Microbial diversity analysis was performed by Mothur, QIIME, Lefse and Metastat. Welch’s t-test and Anosim nonparametric test were used to compare the difference between groups. Results The new silk BMT with 70% immersion depth could be fully covered by the solution, and had good solution preserving and adhesion. The subjects had no foreign body sensation with satisfied experience. Both of the microbes on the new BMT and the control group were lactobacillus as the dominant bacteria genus. The microbial diversity and bacteria constitution in the new BMT was similar to the control group in the condition of 0.45% NaCl solution and 70% immersion depth, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The new silk BMT can transfer the symbiotic microbes of the birth canal efficiently, and the optimal preparation parameters were 0.45% hypotonic saline solution and 70% immersion depth.
Keywords: Optimization, Birth-canal microecology, Transporter, 16S rDNA, New silk
Full Text:
PDFReferences
DOMINGUEZ-BELLO M G, DE JESUS-LABOY K M, SHEN N, et al. Partial restoration of the microbiota of cesarean-born infants via vaginal microbial transfer. Nat Med,2016,22(3): 250–253.
DOMINGUEZ-BELLO M G, COSTELLO E K, CONTRERAS M, et al. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,2010,107(26): 11971–11975.
YORK A. Delivery of the gut microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol,2018, 16(9): 520–521.
FERRETTI P, PASOLLI E, TETT A, et al. Mother-to-infant microbial transmission from different body sites shapes the developing infant gut microbiome. Cell Host Microbe,2018,24(1): 133–145.
WAMPACH L, HEINTZ-BUSCHART A, FRITZ J V, et al. Birth mode is associated with earliest strain -conferred gut microbiome functions and immunostimulatory potential. Nat Commun, 2018, 9(1): 5091[2019-04-13]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07631-x.
MOYA-PÉREZ A, LUCZYNSKI P, RENES I, et al. Intervention strategies for cesarean section-induced alterations in the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Nutr Rev,2017,75(4): 225–240.
STINSON L F, PAYNE M S, KEELAN J A. Planting the seed: origins, composition, and postnatal health significance of the fetal gastrointestinal microbiota. Crit Rev Microbiol,2017,43(3): 352–369.
BLACK M, BHATTACHARYA S, PHILIP S, et al. Planned cesarean delivery at term and adverse outcomes in childhood health. JAMA,2015, 314(21): 2271–2279.
SEVELSTED A, STOKHOLM J, BØNNELYKKE K, et al. Cesarean section and chronic immune disorders. Pediatrics, 2015, 135(1): e92-e98[2019-04-13]. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-0596.
KORPELA K, COSTEA P, COELHO L P, et al. Selective maternal seeding and environment shape the human gut microbiome. Genome Res,2018,28(4): 561–568.
AAGAARD K, PETROSINO J, KEITEL W, et al. The human microbiome project strategy for comprehensive sampling of the human microbiome and why it matters. FASEB J,2013,3(27): 1012–1022. Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature,2012,486(7402): 207–214.
SAHU N, PAL S, SAPRU S, et al. Non-mulberry and mulberry silk protein sericins as potential media supplement for animal cell culture. Biomed Res Int,2016, 2016: 7461041[2019-04-13]. http://doi.org/ 10.1155/2016/7461041.
VISHWANATHAN S A, MORRIS M R, WOLITSKI R J, et al. Rectal application of a highly osmolar personal lubricant in a macaque model induces acute cytotoxicity but does not increase risk of SHIV infection. PLoS One,2015,10(4): e0120021[2019-04-13]. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0120021.
CHOI H J, SONG J M, BONDY B J, et al. Effect of osmotic pressure on the stability of whole inactivated influenza vaccine for coating on microneedles. PLoS One,2015,10(7): e0134431[2019-04-13]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134431.
ROJAS E R, HUANG K C. Regulation of microbial growth by turgor pressure. Curr Opin Microbiol,2018,42: 62–70.
DOBRUT A, GOSIEWSKI T, PABIAN W, et al. The dynamics of vaginal and rectal Lactobacillus spp. flora in subsequent trimesters of pregnancy in healthy Polish women, assessed using the Sanger sequencing method. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,2018,18(1): 350[2019- 04-13]. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1987-7.
TACHEDJIAN G, ALDUNATE M, BRADSHAW C S, et al. The role of lactic acid production by probiotic Lactobacillus species in vaginal health. Res Microbiol,2017,168(9/10): 782–792.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.



