Determination of 18 Perfluorinated Compounds in Tea Leaves by a Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe Method Combined With Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

SUN Weiyang, CHUAI Yujing, ZHOU Xiaotao, ZHANG Tianai, YONG Li, REN Lin, LUO Xinyue, ZOU Xiaoli

Abstract

Objective 

To establish an analytical method for the simultaneous determination of 18 perfluoroalkyl compounds (PFCs) in tea leaves using a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) method for sample pretreatment combined with ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS).

Methods 

The target analytes—18 PFCs—included 13 carboxylic acid PFCs (perfluorobutanoic acid [PFBA], perfluoropentanoic acid [PFPeA], perfluorohexanoic acid [PFHxA], perfluoroheptanoic acid [PFHpA], perfluorooctanoic acid [PFOA], perfluorononanoic acid [PFNA], perfluorodecanoic acid [PFDA], perfluoroundecanoic acid [PFUdA], perfluorododecanoic acid [PFTrDA], perfluorotridecanoic acid [PFTeDA], perfluorotetradecanoic acid [PFHxDA], perfluorohexadecanoic acid [PFHpS], and perfluorooctadecanoic acid [PFODA]) and 5 sulfonic acid PFCs (perfluorobutanesulfonic acid [PFBS], perfluorohexanesulfonic acid [PFHxS], perfluoroheptanesulfonic acid [PFHpS], perfluorooctanesulfonic acid [PFOS], and perfluorodecanesulfonic acid [PFDS]). The QuEChERS pretreatment parameters were systematically optimized using the response surface methodology. The tea leave samples were extracted with an 80% acetonitrile solution and subsequently purified by adding a mixed absorbent consisting of 20 mg N-propyl-ethylenediamine (PSA), 210 mg graphitized carbon black GCB), and 60 mg octadecylsilane (C18). The supernatant was concentrated by nitrogen blowing and subsequently re-dissolved in 50% methanol-2 mmol/L ammonium acetate solution. The re-dissolved solution was injected into the UHPLC-MS/MS for analysis. The target analytes were separated on an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.7 µm). The mobile phases consisted of methanol (phase A) and 2 mmol/L aqueous ammonium acetate (phase B), with a gradient elution procedure. The total running time was 18 min. The mass spectrometry analysis was conducted using an electrospray ionization source in negative ionization mode and multi-reaction monitoring (MRM), with quantification performed using the internal standard curve method. The greenness of the analytical method was assessed using Analytical GREEnness calculator (AGREE) and the Analytical Eco-Scale method (AES).

Results 

Under the optimized conditions, the limits of detection (LODs) and limits of quantification (LOQs) of the method were 0.0057-1.23 ng/g and 0.019-4.09 ng/g, respectively. The average recoveries of most target compounds were 71.1%-117.9%, with relative standard deviations (RSDs) below 15%. The AGREE index of the method was 0.49, and the AES score was 76. At least one PFC was detected in each of the 132 tea leave samples, and the detection rate of carboxylic acid PFC was higher than that of sulfonic acid PFC. The highest detection rates were observed for PFBA at 97.74%, PFHpA at 93.23%, and PFOA at 92.24%. In contrast, PFHpS, PFUdA, PFDoA, PFHxDA, and PFODA were not detected in the samples.

Conclusion 

The proposed method has the advantages of simplicity, rapidity and sensitivity, and is suitable for the analysis of PFCs in tea leaves. The method has high greenness with minimal impact on the operator and the environment. The widespread presence of PFC contamination in tea leaves available in the market warrants strengthened monitoring and regulatory control.

 

Keywords: Perfluorinated compounds, Tea, Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe （QuECHERS), Ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, Response surface method

 

Full Text:

PDF


References


BUCK R C, FRANKLIN J, BERGER U, et al. Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment: terminology, classification, and origins. Integr Environ Assess Manag, 2011, 7(4): 513-541. doi: 10.1002/ieam.258.

PREVEDOUROS K, COUSINS I T, BUCK R C, et al. Sources, fate and transport of perfluorocarboxylates. Environ Sci Technol, 2006, 40(1): 32-44. doi: 10.1021/es0512475.

NAIDU R, NADEBAUM P, FANG C, et al. Per-and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): current status and research needs. Environ Technol Innovation, 2020, 19: 100915. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2020.100915. Convention S. SC-4/17: Listing of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid, its salts and perfluorooctane sulfonyl fluoride. (2009-05-08) [2025-03-15].https://www.informea.org/en/decision/listing-perfluorooctane-sulfonic-acid-its-salts-and-perfluorooctane-sulfonyl-fluoride-0.

European Commission, European Union.Directive 2006/122/ECOF the European Parliament of the Council of 12 December 2006 amending for the 30th time Council Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (perfluorooctane sulfonates) (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union, 2006, L372: 32-34. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2006/122/oj.

European Commission. Water Framework Directive: Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 200/60/EC and 2008/150/EC as regards priority substances in the field of water policy, 2012.

PICÓ Y, FARRÉ M, LLORCA M, et al. Perfluorinated compounds in food: a global perspective. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2011, 51(7): 605-625. doi: 10.1080/10408391003721727.

DOMINGO J L, JOGSTEN I E, ERIKSSON U, et al. Human dietary exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances in Catalonia, Spain. Temporal trend. Food Chem, 2012, 135(3): 1575-1582. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem. 2012.06.054.

HERZKE D, HUBER S, BERVOETS L, et al. Perfluorinated alkylated substances in vegetables collected in four European countries; occurrence and human exposure estimations. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2013, 20(11): 7930-7939. doi: 10.1007/s11356-013-1777-8.

VESTERGREN R, COUSINS I T. Human dietary exposure to per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). Persistent Organic Pollutants & Toxic Metals in Foods, 2013: 279-307. doi: 10.1533/9780857098917.2.279.

D'HOLLANDER W, HERZKE D, HUBER S, et al. Occurrence of perfluorinated alkylated substances in cereals, salt, sweets and fruit items collected in four European countries. Chemosphere, 2015, 129: 179-185. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.10.011.

ZHANG R, ZHANG H, CHEN Q, et al. Composition, distribution and risk of total fluorine, extractable organofluorine and perfluorinated compounds in Chinese teas. Food Chem, 2017, 219: 496-502. doi: 10. 1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.136.

HAUG L S, SALIHOVIC S, JOGSTEN I E, et al. Levels in food and beverages and daily intake of perfluorinated compounds in Norway. Chemosphere, 2010, 80(10): 1137-1143. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.06.023.

HAMPSON H E, COSTELLO E, WALKER D I, et al. Associations of dietary intake and longitudinal measures of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in predominantly Hispanic young adults: a multicohort study. Environ Int, 2024, 185: 108454. doi: 10.1016/j.envint. 2024.108454.

CAMPO J, MASIÁ A, PICÓ Y, et al. Distribution and fate of perfluoroalkyl substances in Mediterranean Spanish sewage treatment plants. Sci Total Environ, 2014, 472: 912-922. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2013.11.056.

LEE H, De SILVA A O, MABURY S A. Dietary bioaccumulation of perfluorophosphonates and perfluorophosphinates in juvenile rainbow trout: evidence of metabolism of perfluorophosphinates. Environ Sci Technol, 2012, 46(6): 3489-3497. doi: 10.1021/es204533m.

ZABALETA I, BIZKARGUENAGA E, PRIETO A, et al. Simultaneous determination of perfluorinated compounds and their potential precursors in mussel tissue and fish muscle tissue and liver samples by liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A, 2015, 1387: 13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.01.089.

SURMA M, SZNAJDER-KATARZYŃSKA K, WICZKOWSKI W, et al. Detection of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in high-protein food products. Environ Toxicol Chem, 2023, 42(12): 2589-2598. doi: 10.1002/ etc.5743.

YAMASHITA N, KANNAN K, TANIYASU S, et al. Analysis of perfluorinated acids at parts-per-quadrillion levels in seawater using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol, 2004, 38(21): 5522-5528. doi: 10.1021/es0492541.

GONZÁLEZ-CURBELO M Á, SOCAS-RODRÍGUEZ B, HERRERA-HERRERA A V, et al. Evolution and applications of the QuEChERS method. Trends Analyt Chem, 2015, 71: 169-185. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2015.04.012.

PERESTRELO R, SILVA P, PORTO-FIGUEIRA P, et al. QuEChERS -Fundamentals, relevant improvements, applications and future trends. Anal Chim Acta, 2019, 1070: 1-28. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.02.036.

SANTANA-MAYOR Á, SOCAS-RODRÍGUEZ B, HERRERA-HERRERA A V, et al. Current trends in QuEChERS method. A versatile procedure for food, environmental and biological analysis. Trends Analyt Chem, 2019, 116: 214-235. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2019.04.018.

ZHENG H, LI J L, LI H H, et al. Analysis of trace metals and perfluorinated compounds in 43 representative tea products from South China. J Food Sci, 2014, 79(6): C1123-C1129. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12470.

JALA A, ADYE D R, BORKAR R M. Occurrence and risk assessments of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances in tea bags from India. Food Control, 2023, 151: 109812. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.109812.

LI S, LIU X, ZHU Y, et al. A statistical approach to determine fluxapyroxad and its three metabolites in soils, sediment and sludge based on a combination of chemometric tools and a modified quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe method. J Chromatogr A, 2014, 1358: 46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.06.088.

MATTAROZZI M, MILIOLI M, BIANCHI F, et al. Optimization of a rapid QuEChERS sample treatment method for HILIC-MS2 analysis of paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) toxins in mussels. Food Control, 2016, 60: 138-145. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.07.027.

KAMAL El-DEEN A, SHIMIZU K. Modified μ-QuEChERS coupled to diethyl carbonate-based liquid microextraction for PAHs determination in coffee, tea, and water prior to GC-MS analysis: an insight to reducing the impact of caffeine on the GC-MS measurement. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 2021, 1171: 122555. doi: 10.1016/j. jchromb.2021.122555.

GAŁUSZKA A, MIGASZEWSKI Z, NAMIEŚNIK J. The 12 principles of green analytical chemistry and the SIGNIFICANCE mnemonic of green analytical practices. Trends Analyt Chem, 2013, 50: 78-84. doi: 10.1016/j. trac.2013.04.010.

KEITH L H, BRASS H J, SULLIVAN D J, et al. An introduction to the National Environmental Methods Index. Environ Sci Technol, 2005, 39(8): 173A-176A. doi: 10.1021/es053241l.

GAŁUSZKA A, MIGASZEWSKI Z M, KONIECZKA P, et al. Analytical Eco-Scale for assessing the greenness of analytical procedures. Trends Analyt Chem, 2012, 37: 61-72. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2012.03.013. PŁOTKA-WASYLKA J. A new tool for the evaluation of the analytical procedure: Green Analytical Procedure Index. Talanta, 2018, 181: 204-209. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.01.013.

BALLESTER-CAUDET A, CAMPÍNS-FALCÓ P, PÉREZ B, et al. A new tool for evaluating and/or selecting analytical methods: summarizing the information in a hexagon. Trends Analyt Chem, 2019, 118: 538-547. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2019.06.015.

PENA-PEREIRA F, WOJNOWSKI W, TOBISZEWSKI M. AGREE-analytical greenness metric approach and software. Anal Chem, 2020, 92(14): 10076-10082. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01887.

SHI M, ZHENG X, ZHANG N, et al. Overview of sixteen green analytical chemistry metrics for evaluation of the greenness of analytical methods. Trends Analyt Chem, 2023, 166: 117211. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2023.117211.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.