Research Progress on the Influence of Tumor Extracellular Matrix Mechanic Properties on Nanodrug Delivery
Abstract
Nanodrugs are widely utilized in the biomedical fields, exhibiting immense potential in cancer therapy in particular. However, tumors exist in an extremely complicated microenvironment where substances like collagen are continuously deposited and remodeled, leading to significant alterations in the mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM) during tumor development. Previous research has primarily focused on the specific physicochemical properties of nanodrugs, such as particle size, electric charge, shape, surface chemistry, etc., and their effects on cellular uptake, cytotoxicity, and in vivo pharmacokinetics. Limited studies have been done to explore the impact of ECM mechanical properties on nanodrug delivery. In this review, we systematically summarized the relevant research findings on this topic from the perspective of the characteristics and testing methods of tumor ECM mechanics. Additionally, we made a thorough discussion of the potential mechanical and biological mechanisms involved in nanodrug delivery. We proposed several noteworthy research directions. Regarding the overall strategy, there is a need to emphasize targeted delivery that combines ECM mechanics and nanomechanics to achieve precise drug delivery. Regarding the spatial aspect, attention should be given to the nonlinear spatial mechanical heterogeneity within the interior of solid tumors and the construction of mechanic microenvironment-adaptive nanocarriers to improve the delivery efficiency. Regarding the temporal aspect, emphasis should be placed on the dynamic development and changes in the mechanical microenvironment during solid tumor growth and treatment processes. Based on the stromal mechanical characteristics of the tumor tissues of individual patients, personalized treatment strategies can be formulated, which will enhance treatment specificity and efficacy. In addition, issues such as mechanically targeted nanodrug delivery, degradation, and metabolism under dynamic ECM mechanical conditions warrant further investigation.
Keywords: Tumor matrix mechanics, Nanodrug delivery, Tumor microenvironment, Mechanobiological mechanism, Review
Full Text:
PDFReferences
ZHANG D, WANG G, YU X, et al. Enhancing CRISPR/Cas gene editing through modulating cellular mechanical properties for cancer therapy. Nat Nanotechnol,2022,17(7): 777–787. doi: 10.1038/s41565-022-01122-3.
SOUNNI N E, NOEL A. Targeting the tumor microenvironment for cancer therapy. Clin Chem,2013,59(1): 85–93. doi: 10.1373/clinchem. 2012.185363.
MUNOZ A, ELDRIDGE W J, JAKOBSEN N M, et al. Corrigendum: cellular shear stiffness reflects progression of arsenic-induced transformation during G1. Carcinogenesis,2019,40(10): 1298. doi: 10. 1093/carcin/bgz048.
PENG Y, CHEN Z, CHEN Y, et al. ROCK isoforms differentially modulate cancer cell motility by mechanosensing the substrate stiffness. Acta Biomater,2019,88: 86–101. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.015.
HE X, YANG Y, HAN Y, et al. Extracellular matrix physical properties govern the diffusion of nanoparticles in tumor microenvironment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,2023,120(1): e2209260120. doi: 10.1073/pnas. 2209260120.
LUO Q, KUANG D, ZHANG B, et al. Cell stiffness determined by atomic force microscopy and its correlation with cell motility. Biochim Biophys Acta,2016,1860(9): 1953–1960. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.06. 010.
PLODINEC M, LOPARIC M, MONNIER C A, et al. The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer. Nat Nanotechnol,2012, 7(11): 757–765. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2012.167.
SHEN Y, WANG X, LU J, et al. Reduction of liver metastasis stiffness improves response to bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Cell,2020,37(6): 800–817.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.05.005.
BAGHBAN M, MOJRA A. Early relaxation time assessment for characterization of breast tissue and diagnosis of breast tumors. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater,2018,87: 325–335. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07. 037.
DEFFIEUX T, GENNISSON J L, BOUSQUET L, et al. Investigating liver stiffness and viscosity for fibrosis, steatosis and activity staging using shear wave elastography. J Hepatol,2015,62(2): 317–324. doi: 10.1016/j. jhep.2014.09.020.
WANG W, LOLLIS E M, BORDELEAU F, et al. Matrix stiffness regulates vascular integrity through focal adhesion kinase activity. FASEB J,2019,33(1): 1199–1208. doi: 10.1096/fj.201800841R.
CHEN Y, LI P, PENG Y, et al. Protective autophagy attenuates soft substrate-induced apoptosis through ROS/JNK signaling pathway in breast cancer cells. Free Radic Biol Med,2021,172: 590–603. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.07.005.
HSU S H, CHEN C Y, LU P S, et al. Oriented Schwann cell growth on microgrooved surfaces. Biotechnol Bioeng,2005,92(5): 579–588. doi: 10. 1002/bit.20634.
BETTINGER C J, ZHANG Z, GERECHT S, et al. Enhancement of In Vitro Capillary Tube Formation by Substrate Nanotopography. Adv Mater,2008,20(1): 99–103. doi: 10.1002/adma.200702487.
NGUYEN A T, SATHE S R, YIM E K. From nano to micro: topographical scale and its impact on cell adhesion, morphology and contact guidance. J Phys Condens Matter,2016,28(18): 183001. doi: 10. 1088/0953-8984/28/18/183001.
PROVENZANO P P, ELICEIRI K W, CAMPBELL J M, et al. Collagen reorganization at the tumor-stromal interface facilitates local invasion. BMC Med,2006,4(1): 38. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-4-38.
CONKLIN M W, EICKHOFF J C, RICHING K M, et al. Aligned collagen is a prognostic signature for survival in human breast carcinoma. Am J Pathol,2011,178(3): 1221–1232. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.11.076.
DRIFKA C R, LOEFFLER A G, MATHEWSON K, et al. Highly aligned stromal collagen is a negative prognostic factor following pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma resection. Oncotarget,2016,7(46): 76197–76213. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12772.
LI M, ZHANG Y, ZHANG Q, et al. Tumor extracellular matrix modulating strategies for enhanced antitumor therapy of nanomedicines. Mater Today Bio,2022,16: 100364. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100364.
WANG S, HUANG P, CHEN X. Hierarchical targeting strategy for enhanced tumor tissue accumulation/retention and cellular internalization. Adv Mater,2016,28(34): 7340–7364. doi: 10.1002/adma. 201601498.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.