Current Advances in Peri-implantitis Mouse Model
Abstract
Peri-implantitis is the most common and intractable complication of dental implant-supported prothesis affecting its long-term success, and is one of the main reasons for implant failure. Due to the limitation of the research methods, the pathogenesis and pathological processes of peri-implantitis remain unclear. Animal models are indispensable tools to study the pathogenesis of diseases. With the advances of the dental implants, the peri-implantitis mouse model has been used in experimental research. This paper summarized recent studies from the following five aspects: the advantages of the mouse model, the influence of mouse strain, the design of micro-implant, the way of implant insertion, as well as the induction of peri-implantitis, aiming to provide references and help for researchers. Compared with the large animal models of peri-implantitis, the mouse model of peri-implantitis is more flexible in use. Lower costs can better control the sample number and shorter induction time can better control experimental duration. The completion of mouse genome sequencing and the progress of the genetic operating system also make the pathogenetic study possible. However, the mouse model of peri-implantitis still has some limitations. Limited by the small size of mouse oral cavity, implant insertion surgery is technically demanding, and complex surgeries are even more challenging. Moreover, due to short history of the peri-implantitis mouse model, its corresponding technical theories such as implantation methods, peri-implantitis induction methods and so on are not unified yet and still need further research and development.
Keywords: Peri-implantitis, Disease model, Mouse model, Modeling method
Full Text:
PDFReferences
DREYER H, GRISCHKE J, TIEDE C, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of peri-implantitis: a systematic review. J Periodont Res,2018, 53(5): 657–681.
DOORNEWAARD R, JACQUET W, COSYN J, et al. How do peri‐implant biologic parameters correspond with implant survival and peri‐implantitis? A critical review. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018,29(6):100–123.
CARCUAC O, BERGLUNDH T. Composition of human peri-implantitis and periodontitis lesions. J Dent Res,2014,93(11): 1083–1088.
SCHWARZ F, SCULEAN A, ENGEBRETSON S P, et al. Animal models for peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Periodontology 2000,2015,68(1): 168–181.
WEINBERG M A, BRAL M. Laboratory animal models in periodontology. J Clin Periodontol,1999,26(6): 335–340.
SCHOU S, HOLMSTRUP P, STOLTZE K, et al. Probing around implants and teeth with healthy or inflamed peri-implant mucosa/gingiva. A histologic comparison in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Clin Oral Implant Res,2002,13(2): 113–126.
PERSSON L G, ERICSSON I, BERGLUNDH T, et al. Guided bone regeneration in the treatment of periimplantitis. Clin Oral Implant Res, 1996,7(4): 366–372.
YU X, HU Y, FREIRE M, et al. Role of toll-like receptor 2 in inflammation and alveolar bone loss in experimental peri-implantitis versus periodontitis. J Periodont Res,2018,53(1): 98–106.
DENG S, HU Y, ZHOU J, et al. TLR4 mediates alveolar bone resorption in experimental peri‐implantitis through regulation of CD45+ cell infiltration, RANKL/OPG ratio, and inflammatory cytokine production. J Periodontol,2020,91(5): 671–682.
HIYARI S, NAGHIBI A, WONG R, et al. Susceptibility of different mouse strains to peri-implantitis. J Periodont Res,2018,53(1): 107–116. DING L, ZHANG P, WANG X, et al. A doxycycline-treated hydroxyapatite implant surface attenuates the progression of peri-implantitis: a radiographic and histological study in mice. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res,2019,21(1): 154–159.
VARON-SHAHAR E, SHUSTERMAN A, PIATTELLI A, et al. Peri-implant alveolar bone resorption in an innovative peri-implantitis murine model: effect of implant surface and onset of infection. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res,2019,21(4): 723–733.
WONG R L, HIYARI S, YAGHSEZIAN A, et al. Comparing the healing potential of late-stage periodontitis and peri-implantitis. J Oral Implantol,2017,43(6): 437–445.
NGUYEN VO T N, HAO J, CHOU J, et al. Ligature induced peri-implantitis: tissue destruction and inflammatory progression in a murine model. Clin Oral Implant Res,2017,28(2): 129–136.
PIRIH F Q, HIYARI S, BARROSO A D V, et al. Ligature-induced peri-implantitis in mice. J Periodont Res,2015,50(4): 519–524.
MOURARET S, HUNTER D J, BARDET C, et al. A pre-clinical murine model of oral implant osseointegration. Bone,2014,58: 177–184. BIGUETTI C C, CAVALLA F, SILVEIRA E M, et al. Oral implant osseointegration model in C57Bl/6 mice: microtomographic, histological, histomorphometric and molecular characterization. J Appl Oral Sci, 2018, 26: e20170601[2020-07-03]. https://doi.org/10.1590/ 1678-7757-2017-0601.
PAN K, HU Y, WANG Y, et al. RANKL blockade alleviates peri-implant bone loss and is enhanced by anti-inflammatory microRNA-146a through TLR2/4 signaling. Int J Implant Dent,2020,6(1): 15[2020-07-03]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00210-0.
LI H, CHEN Z, ZHONG X, et al. Mangiferin alleviates experimental peri-implantitis via suppressing interleukin-6 production and Toll-like receptor 2 signaling pathway. J Orthopaedic Surg Res,2019,14(1): 325[2020-07-03]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1387-3 .
HIYARI S, WONG R L, YAGHSEZIAN A, et al. Ligature-induced peri-implantitis and periodontitis in mice. J Clin Periodontol,2018,45(1): 89–99.
WONG R L, HIYARI S, YAGHSEZIAN A, et al. Early intervention of peri-implantitis and periodontitis using a mouse model. J Periodontol, 2018,89(6): 669–679.
TZACH-NAHMAN R, MIZRAJI G, SHAPIRA L, et al. Oral infection with P. gingivalis induces peri-implantitis in a murine model: evaluation of bone loss and the local inflammatory response. J Clin Periodontol, 2017,44(7): 739–748.
PIRIH F Q, HIYARI S, LEUNG H Y, et al. A murine model of lipopolysaccharide-induced peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. J Oral Implantol, 2015, 41(5): e158–e164.[2020-06-14]. https://doi.org/10. 1563/aaid-joi-D-14-00068.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.



