Detection of GNAQ/11 Mutations in Uveal Melanoma Patients’ FFPE DNA with Droplet Digital PCR
Abstract
To quantitatively detect GNAQ/11 mutations in uveal melanoma (UM) by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Methods Formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples were taken from 78 UM patients with enucleation in West China Hospital between 2009 and 2015. None of the patients received radiotherapy or chemotherapy before enucleation. A retrospective study was conducted to detect GNAQ/11 mutation in UM by ddPCR. To compare the consistency of the results of the two detection methods, DNA sequencing was performed on the target gene by Sanger sequencing. 78 patients with UM were studied retrospectively. GNAQ/11 mutations in uveal melanoma was detected by ddPCR. The consistency of the results of the two detection methods was analyzed. Results GNAQ/11 mutations frequency was 91.9%. The consistency test between Sanger sequencing and ddPCR of GNAQ/11 mutations in 74 patients with UM was conducted. Kappa coefficient=0.436, P=0.001. The error rate of Sanger sequencing results was significantly higher in the heterogeneous group than in the homogeneous group (12/37 vs. 3/16, P=0.53), but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion The results of ddPCR and Sanger sequencing showed good consistency, and the mutation ratio of GNAQ/11 in UM was significantly different. GNAQ/11 mutation frequency in UM patients detected by ddPCR was close to the reported frequency. It is more recommended to use ddPCR with high sensitivity to detect gene mutations in samples of tumor tissue DNA derived from FFPE. Sanger sequencing is prone to false negative results.
Keywords: Uveal melanoma, GNAQ/11, ddPCR, Sanger sequencing
Full Text:
PDFReferences
ONKEN M D, WORLEY L A, LONG M D, et al. Oncogenic mutations in GNAQ occur early in uveal melanoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2008,49(12): 5230–5234.
VAN RAAMSDONK C D, GRIEWANK K G, CROSBY M B, et al. Mutations in Gna11 in uveal melanoma. N Engl J Med,2010,363(23): 2191–2199.
DIENER-WEST M. Development of metastatic disease after enrollment in the coms trials for treatment of choroidal melanoma. Arch Ophthalmol, 2005,123(12): 1639–1643.
RADHIKA V, DHANASEKARAN N. Transforming G proteins. Oncogene,2001,20(13): 1607–1614.
GOLDSMITH Z G, DHANASEKARAN D N. G protein regulation of MAPK networks. Oncogene,2007,26(22): 3122–3142.
CARVAJAL R D, SOSMAN J A, QUEVEDO J F, et al. Effect of selumetinib vs chemotherapy on progression-free survival in uveal melanoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA,2014,311(23): 2397–2405.
FENG X, DEGESE M S, IGLESIAS-BARTOLOME R, et al. Hippo-independent activation of YAP by the GNAQ uveal melanoma oncogene through a Trio-regulated Rho GTPase signaling circuitry. Cancer Cell, 2014,25(6): 831–845.
GRIEWANK K G, MURALI R, SCHILLING B, et al. Tert promoter mutations in ocular melanoma distinguish between conjunctival and uveal tumours. Br J Cancer,2013,109(2): 497–501.
MCEVOY A C, WOOD B A, ARDAKANI N M, et al. Droplet digital PCR for mutation detection in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded melanoma tissues: a comparison with Sanger sequencing and pyrosequencing. J Mol Diagn,2018,20(2): 240–252.
HINDSON B J, NESS K D, MASQUELIER D A, et al. High-throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of DNA copy number. Anal Chem,2011,83(22): 8604–8610.
LAMY P J, CASTAN F, LOZANO N, et al. Next-generation genotyping by digital PCR to detect and quantify the BRAF V600E mutation in melanoma biopsies. J Mol Diagn,2015,17(4): 366–373.
PHALLEN J, SAUSEN M, ADLEFF V, et al. Direct detection of early-stage cancers using circulating tumor DNA. Sci Transl Med, 2017, 9(403): eaan2415[2019-12-14]. http://www.sciencemag.org/about/science-licenses-journal-article-reuse.
TEO C R, RAJAN-BABU I S, LAW H Y, et al. Methylation-specific triplet-primed PCR and melting curve analysis as a rapid screening tool for identifying actionable FMR1 genotypes. Clin Chem,2013,59(11): 1668–1670.
LEE S H, KIM J E, JANG H S, et al. Genetic alterations among Korean melanoma patients showing tumor heterogeneity: a comparison between primary tumors and corresponding metastatic lesions. Cancer Res Treat, 2018,50(4): 1378–1387.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.



