Combined Analysis of Dyslipidemia and Tumor Markers for the Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer
Abstract
Objective
To investigate changes in serum lipid profile parameters combined with tumor markers in gastric cancer (GC) patients and their value in GC screening.
Methods
A total of 100 patients diagnosed with GC at Renji Hospital (West) between May and September 2025 were consecutively enrolled as the GC group (54 cases in stage Ⅰ/Ⅱ and 46 cases in stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ). Additionally, 100 age- and sex-matched healthy individuals undergoing routine physical examinations were included as the healthy control (HC) group. The serum levels of nine lipid indicators (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], total cholesterol [TC], triglycerides [TG], small and dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [sdLDL-C], apolipoprotein [Apo] A1, ApoB, ApoC2, and ApoC3) and five tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA], carbohydrate antigen [CA] 19-9, CA50, CA242, and CA72-4) were measured using an automatic biochemical analyzer and an electrochemiluminescence instrument. Intergroup differences were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test. A stepwise Fisher discriminant analysis was used to establish a screening model based on lipid profiles and tumor markers. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and the model's diagnostic performance was validated using 30 GC patients and 30 healthy controls consecutively enrolled from September to December 2025.
Results
Compared with the HC group, the GC group showed significantly lower levels of ApoA1, ApoC3, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, and sdLDL-C (P < 0.05), while CEA and CA50 levels were significantly higher (P < 0.05). Patients with stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ GC had lower levels of ApoA1, ApoB, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, and sdLDL-C compared to those with stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ GC (P < 0.05). ROC analysis showed that among individual indicators, HDL-C had the highest diagnostic performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.797 (95% CI: 0.734-0.850), sensitivity of 78%, and specificity of 74%. The screening model including ApoA1, ApoC3, HDL-C, LDL-C, TC, sdLDL-C, CEA, CA50, and age achieved an AUC of 0.940 (95% CI: 0.891-0.971), with 83.75% sensitivity and 92.5% specificity, outperforming any single biomarker in diagnostic efficacy.
Conclusion
The combined panel of ApoA1, ApoC3, HDL-C, LDL-C, TC, sdLDL-C, CEA, CA50 and age offers a potential auxiliary tool for detecting gastric cancer.
Keywords: Gastric cancer, Blood lipid, Tumor markers, Diagnostic efficacy, Fisher discriminant model
Full Text:
PDFReferences
SUNG H, FERLAY J, SIEGEL R L, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. doi: 10. 3322/caac.21660.
ZHENG R, ZHANG S, ZENG H, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2016. J Natl Cancer Cent, 2022, 2(1): 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2022.02.002
Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Chinese Society of Gastric Cancer, Chinese Medical Association Publishing House. Chinese Medical Association Guidelines for clinical diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer (2021 edition). National Medical Journal of China, 2022, 102(16): 1169-1189. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20220127-00197.
National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases (Shanghai), National Early Gastrointestinal Cancer Prevention and Treatment Center Alliance (GECA), Helicobacter pylori Committee of Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, et al. Chinese consensus on eradication of Helicobacter pylori and prevention and control of gastric cancer(2019, Shanghai). Chinese Journal of Health Management, 2019, 13(4): 285-291. doi: 10. 3760/cma.j.issn.1674-0815.2019.04.004.
XU T T, LI G Y, CAO L F, et al. Clinical significance of alterations in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism in gastric cancer. Journal of Dalian Medical University, 2018, 40(1): 65-70. doi: 10.11724/jdmu.2018.01.13.
CHEN J J, WU R. Expression and clinical significance of five tumor markers in the serum of patients with gastric cancer. Journal of China Medical University, 2011, 40(8): 752-754.
XU X, XU Y M LI G Q, et al. Construction and value of a diagnostic model for gastric precancerous lesions based on hematological indicators. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(9): 1-7. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20231259.
LIANG Y F, LI C Y, ZHOU H. Construction and evaluation of a diagnostic nomogram model for early gastric cancer based on multi-laboratory tests results. Zhejiang Medical Journal, 2025, 47(1): 14-20. doi: 10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2025.47.1.2024-1355.
LI C L, ZHANG L L, QIU Z D, et al. Key molecules of fatty acid metabolism in gastric cancer. Biomolecules, 2022, 12(5): 706. doi: 10. 3390/biom12050706.
AOKI T, KINOSHITA J, MUNESUE S, et al. Hypoxia-induced CD36 expression in gastric cancer cells promotes peritoneal metastasis via fatty acid uptake. Ann Surg Oncol, 2023, 30(5): 3125-3126. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12465-5.
LI F, DOU J, WEI L, LI S, et al. Biomarkers of lipid metabolism in gastric cancer: a case control study. BMC Cancer, 2024, 24(1): 455. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12230-9.
LUO N, SHI R C, DAI R Y, et al. Cholesterol metabolism and tumor immunity. J Sichuan Univ (Med Sci), 2022, 53(2): 335-341. doi: 10.12182/ 20220360202.
YU L, LAI Q, FENG Q, et al. Serum metabolic profiling analysis of chronic gastritis and gastric cancer by untargeted metabolomics. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 636917. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.636917.
ZHANG W, ZHOU D, SONG S, et al. Prediction and verification of the prognostic biomarker SLC2A2 and its association with immune infiltration in gastric cancer. Oncol Lett, 2023, 27(2): 70. doi: 10.3892/ol. 2023.14203.
ZHU J R, GAO R L, ZHAO S P, et al. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of dyslipidemia in Chinese adults (2016 revision). J Chin Circ, 2016, 31(10): 937-953. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2016.10.001.
KIM H K, HONG J, AHN S, et al. Association between measured or calculated small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and oxidized low-density lipoprotein in subjects with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Lab Anal, 2023, 37(1): e24807. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24807.
ZHAO T J, ZHU N, SHI Y N, et al. Targeting HDL in tumor microenvironment: new hope for cancer therapy. J Cell Physiol, 2021, 236(11): 7853-7873. doi: 10.1002/jcp.30412.
GRAO-CRUCES E, LOPEZ-ENRIQUEZ S, MARTIN M E, et al. High-density lipoproteins and immune response: a review. Int J Biol Macromol, 2022, 195: 117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.12.009.
XU P, ZHANG Q, ZHAI J, et al. APOA1 promotes tumor proliferation and migration and may be a potential pan-cancer biomarker and immunotherapy target. Transl Oncol, 2025, 55: 102344. doi: 10.1016/j. tranon.2025.102344.
DAI W, ZHANG Z, YAO C, et al. Emerging evidences for the opposite role of apolipoprotein C3 and apolipoprotein A5 in lipid metabolism and coronary artery disease. Lipids Health Dis, 2019, 18(1): 220. doi: 10.1186/s12944-019-1166-5.
HU X, JIA X, XU C, et al. Downregulation of NK cell activities in apolipoprotein C-Ⅲ-induced hyperlipidemia resulting from lipid-induced metabolic reprogramming and crosstalk with lipid-laden dendritic cells. Metabolism, 2021, 120: 154800. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol. 2021.154800.
WANG X, GONG Y, DENG T, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of mRNA expressions of apolipoprotein A and C family genes in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cell Biochem, 2019, 120(10): 18246-18265. doi: 10.1002/jcb.29131.
JANSEN K, KORNFELD L, LENNARTZ M, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen expression in human tumors: a tissue microarray study on 13, 725 tumors . Cancers (Basel), 2024, 16(23): 4052. doi: 10.3390/cancers16234052.
BATRA P, NARASANNAIAH A H, REDDY V, et al. Prognostic value of tumor markers in gastric cancer: a tertiary cancer centre experience. Cureus, 2023, 15(7): e42328. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42328.
DING J, ZHANG H, WU Z. Study on the differential value of tumor marker CA724 on primary gastric cancer. J Oncol, 2021, 2021: 2929233. doi: 10.1155/2021/2929233.
ZHOU H, WANG X C, YUAN B B, et al. Clinical value of combining serum tumor marker detection with fecal occult blood testing in diagnosing colorectal cancer. J Physiol Pharmacol, 2022, 73(3): 443-449. doi: 10.26402/jpp.2022.3.12.
MA Y, WANG Y, HU C, et al. The percentages of signet-ring cells (SRCs) affects the prognosis after radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2023, 408(1): 376. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03114-w.
ZHANG Z G, XU L, ZHANG P J, et al. Evaluation of the value of multiparameter combined analysis of serum markers in the early diagnosis of gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol, 2020, 12(4): 483-491. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i4.483.
WU Y Z, XU R H, ZHANG J, et al. Value of combined detection of ApoA2, C1INH, and ALB in the screening of stageⅠ-Ⅲ colorectal cancer. Int J Lab Med, 2025, 46(6): 670-674. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4130. 2025.06.006.
GONG Y D, LIU X, SAHU A, et al. Exploration of hub genes, lipid metabolism, and the immune microenvironment in stomach carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Transl Med, 2022, 10(15): 834. doi: 10. 21037/atm-22-3530.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.



