Current Status and Effect Pathways of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Medical Care and Prevention Integration Among Medical Professionals

LI Qiaosheng, WANG Ting, JIAN Weiyan

Abstract

Objective 

 To investigate the changes in knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) regarding the integration of medical care and prevention among medical professionals in medical institutions of pilot cities of the collaboration and integration of medical care and prevention, a national pilot program for infectious disease prevention and control, to examine the effect pathways, and to provide empirical evidence for promoting the implementation of the integration of medical care and prevention and improving relevant policies.

Methods 

The participants in this study were medical professionals involved in medical care and prevention integration work. The participants were all from medical institutions of pilot cities for the collaboration and integration of medical care and prevention. The study sample was selected through multi-stage sampling. A questionnaire based on the theoretical framework of the KAP model was designed. Two cross-sectional surveys were conducted—once before the initiation of the pilot program (baseline) and again 12 months after implementation (after implementation). After propensity score matching (PSM), descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing were used to statistically analyze the questionnaire data. In addition, a structural equation model (SEM) was applied to assess the current status and effect pathways of the participants' KAP regarding the integration of medical care and prevention.

Results 

A total of 11472 responses were collected, and 10627 were included in analysis after PSM, including 5007 before the implementation of the policy and 5620 after the implementation of the policy. No significant differences were observed in demographic variables between the two samples. Baseline scores for knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding the integration of medical care and prevention were 13.32 ± 0.05, 15.62 ± 0.04, and 6.37 ± 0.02 respectively, while the scores at the end of the study were 13.69, 15.74, and 6.51, respectively, all show an increase to a certain degree (P < 0.05). Stratified analysis by institution level revealed relatively significant improvements in knowledge and practice (P < 0.05), but no significant improvement in attitudes (P > 0.05) among medical professionals. Medical professionals in primary medical institutions generally demonstrated superior knowledge, attitudes, and practice frequency compared with those in secondary and tertiary hospitals (P < 0.001). No significant changes in KAP were observed among medical professionals in secondary hospitals (P > 0.05). Regarding the integration of medical care and prevention, the effect of knowledge on practice (standardized path coefficient = 0.496, 95% CI: 0.482, 0.508) was stronger than that of attitude on practice (standardized path coefficient = 0.267, 95% CI: 0.244, 0.290). The direct effect of knowledge on practice (78.0%) was greater than the indirect effect mediated by attitude (22.0%).

Conclusion 

 The national pilot program for the collaboration between and integration of medical care and prevention in infectious disease prevention and control has a positive effect on improving the KAP regarding the integration of medical care and prevention among medical professionals. Knowledge of the integration of medical care and prevention is the primary factor influencing practice.

 

Keywords: Medical professionals, Integration of medical care and prevention, Knowledge, attitude, and practice

 

Full Text:

PDF


References


YIP W, FU H, CHEN A T, et al. 10 years of health-care reform in China: progress and gaps in Universal Health Coverage. Lancet, 2019, 394(10204): 1192-1204. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32136-1.

YIP W C, HSIAO W C, CHEN W, et al. Early appraisal of China's huge and complex health-care reforms. Lancet, 2012, 379(9818): 833-842. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61880-1.

GU H, LI Z H, WANG F R, et al. Study on key issues, mechanism innovation and implementation path of integration of medical and prevention. Health Economics Research, 2024, 41(1): 45-49. doi: 10. 14055/j.cnki.33-1056/f.2024.01.004.

WANG C Z, ZHANG Y, ZHANG L. Analysis of the management and service mechanisms in the integration dilemma of medicine and prevention in China. Chinese Journal of Health Policy, 2024, 17(1): 2-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-298.2024.01.001.

HU M L, ZHANG Q, SHEN D, et al. Research on implementation mechanism of treatment-pervention integration under the background of constructing integrated service system. Chinese General Practice, 2024, 27(22): 2706-2713. doi: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0722.

LI X, LU J, HU S, et al. The primary health-care system in China. Lancet, 2017, 390(10112): 2584-2594. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33109-4.

LIU J, YAN W X, LIU M, et al. Medical-prevention coordination in the costruction of healthy China in the new era: theoretical mechanisms and policy evolution. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2023, 37(3): 451-460. doi: 10.16262/j.cnki.1000-8217.2023.03.009.

XIAO Y B, WANG X Y, LI B Y. Theoretical framework of dynamic capacity empowering the integration of medical care and prevention in grassroots medical institutions. Medicine and Society, 2025, 38(1): 16-22. doi: 10.13723/j.yxysh.2025.01.003.

CUI L Y, DAI G L X, TAO H B. Study on the typical path and realization mechanism of medical and preventive integration in China: based on thematic framework analysis. Health Economics Research, 2024, 41(12): 16-20. doi: 10.14055/j.cnki.33-1056/f.2024.12.015.

HAO Y W, LI B, WEI L R, et al. Current situation of the construction of the integration mechanism of medical treatment and prevention in infectious disease hospitals in China. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2025, 52(8): 1428-1434. doi: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202501157.

WU Z, TIAN H, XU D, et al. Influencing factors and symbiotic mechanism of the integration of medical care and disease prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of public hospital employees. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 20(1): 241. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010241.

WILLIAMS J, SACHDEV N, KIRLEY K, et al. Implementation of diabetes prevention in health care organizations: best practice recommendations. Popul Health Manag, 2022, 25(1): 31-38. doi: 10.1089/pop.2021.0044.

LI L Q, ZHAI X T, SUN K, et al. Analysis of the satisfaction and influencing factors of chronic disease patient with upward and downward referral services from the perspective of medical prevention integration based on survey of township primary medical institutions in Jiangxi Province. Chinese Health Service Management, 2025, 42(1): 107-112.

CUI Z H, WANG H F. Study on the influencing factors of medical staff's behavior and intention to prevention and treatment integration in the merged medical community from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Chinese Hospital Management, 2024, 44(2): 40-45.

DENG J, FANG Y, WANG Q, et al. Meta-analysis of KAP toward COVID-19 in Chinese residents. Front Public Health, 2024, 12: 1279293. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1279293.

REN L X, ZHANG T Y, YOU C X, et al. Analysis of the implementation path of medical-prevention integration in public hospitals in China from an integrated care perspective. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2024, 40(12): 1538-1544. doi: 10.11847/zgggws1144950.

LIU L F, YAO L, QIU Z H, et al. Dilemmas and development strategies of the provision of medical care and prevention integration services in grassroots medical institutions in Shenzhen. Medicine and Society, 2024, 37(12): 18-25. doi: 10.13723/j.yxysh.2024.12.003.

NOORIHEKMAT S, RAHIMI H, MEHROLHASSANI M H, et al. Frameworks of performance measurement in public health and primary care system: a scoping review and meta-synthesis. Int J Prev Med, 2020, 11: 165. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_34_19.

LI X, KRUMHOLZ H M, YIP W, et al. Quality of primary health care in China: challenges and recommendations. Lancet, 2020, 395(10239): 1802-1812. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30122-7.

ZHENG Z, GUO Y, CHEN H, et al. A survey on the current status quo and perception of medical and preventive services in primary health care institutions in China under the background of medical and prevention integration. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2022, 49(21): 3932-3936. doi: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM.202204419.

WANG Z J, GAO J W, LI C C, et al. Conception and satisfaction of integration of medical and prevention from providers' perspective. Chinese General Practice, 2025, 28(13): 1655-1660. doi: 10.12114/j.issn. 1007-9572.2023.0736.

LAI S H, CHEN J C, MA S J, et al. Analysis on evaluation of working cognition and cognitive evaluation of medical-preventive integration of public health personnel in county medical alliances of Hangzhou. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2023, 50(5): 879-883. doi: 10.20043/j.cnki.MPM. 202210113.

CAI C, MILLETT C, XIONG S, et al. Impact of China's primary healthcare reforms on utilisation, payments and self-reported health: a quasi-experimental analysis of a middle-aged and older cohort 2011-2018. BMJ Public Health, 2025, 3(1): e001595. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001595.

NODA S, HERNANDEZ P M R, SUDO K, et al. Service delivery reforms for Asian ageing societies: a cross-country study between Japan, South Korea, China, Thailand, Indonesia, and the Philippines. Int J Integr Care, 2021, 21(2): 1. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4739.

YIP W, FU H, JIAN W, et al. Universal health coverage in China part 2: addressing challenges and recommendations. Lancet Public Health, 2023, 8(12): e1035-e1042. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00255-4.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.