Clinical Practice and Quality Control Strategies for Complex Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery

LI Jingwen, , WU Zhong, PENG Bing

Abstract

With continuous advancements in the concepts of minimally invasive surgery, pancreatic surgery is gradually undergoing a transformative shift toward minimally invasive approaches. Compared with traditional open surgeries, minimally invasive procedures offer advantages such as reduced trauma, faster recovery, and fewer complications. However, due to the complex anatomical structure of the pancreas and the technical difficulties of surgical procedures, the widespread adoption of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery still faces numerous technical challenges. Currently, laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is primarily performed in large, specialized centers with experienced teams and well-established systems. Given the high technical complexity and associated risks, reducing intraoperative risks and minimizing postoperative complications remain key focuses and major challenges in current research. This review is focused on intraoperative risk control and postoperative complication management in complex minimally invasive pancreatic surgery. We conducted a comprehensive review of recent advances in China and abroad, covering the latest progress in preoperative assessment, intraoperative procedures, complication prevention, quality management, and technological innovation. Furthermore, we discussed potential development directions in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery, including technical refinement, discipline development, procedural standardization, and multi-center collaboration. Our goal is to promote a continued progress toward more standardized, personalized, and intelligent surgical practices—ultimately benefiting a broader population of patients with pancreatic diseases.

 

Keywords: Laparoscope, Minimally invasive, Pancreatic surgery, Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, Review

 

Full Text:

PDF


References


AOKI S, MIYATA H, KONNO H, et al. Risk factors of serious postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy and risk calculators for predicting postoperative complications: a nationwide study of 17, 564 patients in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2017, 24(5): 243-251. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.438.

ASBUN H J, MOEKOTTE A L, VISSERS F L, et al. The miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg, 2020, 271(1): 1-14. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003590.

Van HILST J, De ROOIJ T, BOSSCHA K, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2019, 4(3): 199-207. doi: 10. 1016/S2468-1253(19)30004-4.

WANG Z M, ZHANG Z Z, LIU W S, et al. The anatomic characteristic and management of the dorsal pancreatic artery in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, 2023, 28(10): 733-738. doi: 10.13499/j.cnki.fqjwkzz.2023.10.733.

CHENG H, WU H J, LIANG M P, et al. Application value of three-dimensional reconstruction in vascular treatment in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, 2022, 27(12): 893-897. doi: 10.13499/j.cnki.fqjwkzz.2022.12.893.

WANG M, PENG B, LIU J, et al. Practice patterns and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in China: a retrospective multicenter analysis of 1029 patients. Ann Surg, 2021, 273(1): 145-153. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003190.

LI Y B, CAI Y Q, WANG X, et al. Optimization of operative procedure in total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (with video). J Sichuan Univ ( Med Sci), 2020, 51(4): 446-452. doi: 10.12182/20200760108.

YANG F, LIU Y H, LIU S Y, et al. Clinical application of total laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy with inferior-posterior uncinate process and artery first approach. Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery, 2018, 18(10): 908-910. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2018.10.013.

TAN Z J, SHEN Z T, CHEN G H, et al. Key techniques to Further Improve the Safety of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery, 2022, 42(5): 535-538. doi: 10.19538/j.cjps. issn1005-2208.2022.05.14.

DAI M H. Clinical significance of semi-derotation artery first approach in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery (Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(4): 275-278. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2018.04.002.

MU Y P, JIN W W. The key points and strategies of laparoscopic pancreaticodeduonectomy. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery, 2022, 42(5): 491-493. doi: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2022.05.03.

LIU W S, LI Z, ZHUO Q F, et al. Key techniques to further improve the safety of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery, 2025, 45(1): 80-83. doi: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208. 2025.01.13.

HALLS M C, CIPRIANI F, BERARDI G, et al. Conversion for unfavorable intraoperative events results in significantly worse outcomes during laparoscopic liver resection: lessons learned from a multicenter review of 2861 cases. Ann Surg, 2018, 268(6): 1051-1057. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002332.

CHENG K, WANG X, PENG B. Comment on: risk of conversion to open surgery during robotic and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy and effect on outcomes: international propensity score-matched comparison study. Br J Surg, 2021, 108(11): e380. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab243.

HUA S, GAO J, WANG Z, et al. Automatic bleeding detectionin laparoscopic surgery based on a faster region-basedconvolutional neural network. Ann Transl Med, 2022, 10(10): 546. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-1914.

LI Y T, ZHANG H Y, XING C, et al. Effect of blumgart anastomosis in reducing the incidence rate of pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol, 2019, 25(20): 2514-2523. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i20.2514.

XU Z, CHEN J, MOU Y, et al. Effects of nutritional status on short-term prognosis after minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectom. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 29549. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81016-7.

MORI T, HIRA G, KIMURA K, et al. A case of perforation of a pancreatic duct by a pancreatic stent during chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic head cancer: a case report. Surg Case Rep, 2019, 5(1): 10. doi: 10.1186/s40792-019-0571-3.

CAI H, LU F, ZHANG M, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy without pancreatic duct stent after laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: preliminary outcomes from a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(5): 3629-3636. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08909-w.

CAO Z, QIU J, GUO J, et al. A randomised, multicentre trial of somatostatin to prevent clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula in intermediate-risk patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastroenterol, 2021, 56(10): 938-948. doi: 10.1007/s00535-021-01818-8.

MA T, BAI X, CHEN W, et al. Surgical management and outcome of grade-C pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. Int J Surg, 2019, 68: 27-34. doi: 10. 1016/j.ijsu.2019.05.019.

EISENBERG J D, ROSATO E L, LAVU H, et al. Delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an analysis of risk factors and cost. J Gastrointest Surg, 2015, 19(9): 1572-1580. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2865-5.

FRANCKEN M F G, Van ROESSEL S, SWIJNENBURG R J, et al. Hospital costs of delayed gastric emptying following pancreatoduodenectomy and the financial headroom for novel prophylactic treatment strategies. HPB (Oxford), 2021, 23(12): 1865-1872. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.04.025.

MOHAMMED S, VAN B I G, MCELHANY A, et al. Delayed gastric emptying following pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, risk factors, and healthcare utilization. World J Gastrointest Surg, 2017, 9(3): 73-81. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i3.73.

LI X, QIN T, ZHU F, et al. Clinical efficacy of the preservation of the hepatic branch of the vagus nerve on delayed gastric emptying after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg, 2021, 25(8): 2172-2183. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05024-y.

ZHANG H, FENG Y, SUOLANG D, et al. Postoperative fluid balance and outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in 301 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2022, 407(4): 1537-1544. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02443-6.

KAWAI M, TANI M, HIRONO S, et al. Pylorus ring resection reduces delayed gastric emptying in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of pylorus-resecting versus pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg, 2011, 253(3): 495-501. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820d98f1.

PARMAR A D, SHEFFIELD K M, VARGAS G M, et al. Factors associated with delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford), 2013, 15(10): 763-772. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12129.

MENG L, LI J, OUYANG G, et al. Delayed gastric emptying after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center experience of 827 cases. BMC Surg, 2024, 24(1): 145. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02447-7.

MENG L, GAO P, PENG B. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with superior mesenteric vein resection and artificial vascular graft reconstruction for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg, 2020, 24(12): 2906-2907. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04808-y.

ZHAO L, ZHANG M, WANG X, et al. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. Asian J Surg, 2022, 45(3): 888-889. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.11.064.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.